aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/Documentation
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2019-09-29 19:52:52 -0700
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2019-09-29 19:52:52 -0700
commit97f9a3c4eee55b0178b518ae7114a6a53372913d (patch)
tree03b87ee366ed32ac87b3e0919c7919c5223fda09 /Documentation
parent1eb80d6ffb1759968374606c1e36ea88e043e66d (diff)
parentdc925a36060e8cef050a9d05c64dae1c30dc5027 (diff)
Merge tag 'char-misc-5.4-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/char-misc
Pull Documentation/process update from Greg KH: "Here are two small Documentation/process/embargoed-hardware-issues.rst file updates that missed my previous char/misc pull request. The first one adds an Intel representative for the process, and the second one cleans up the text a bit more when it comes to how the disclosure rules work, as it was a bit confusing to some companies" * tag 'char-misc-5.4-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/char-misc: Documentation/process: Clarify disclosure rules Documentation/process: Volunteer as the ambassador for Intel
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/process/embargoed-hardware-issues.rst42
1 files changed, 34 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/process/embargoed-hardware-issues.rst b/Documentation/process/embargoed-hardware-issues.rst
index 402636356fbe..a3c3349046c4 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/embargoed-hardware-issues.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/embargoed-hardware-issues.rst
@@ -143,6 +143,20 @@ via their employer, they cannot enter individual non-disclosure agreements
in their role as Linux kernel developers. They will, however, agree to
adhere to this documented process and the Memorandum of Understanding.
+The disclosing party should provide a list of contacts for all other
+entities who have already been, or should be, informed about the issue.
+This serves several purposes:
+
+ - The list of disclosed entities allows communication accross the
+ industry, e.g. other OS vendors, HW vendors, etc.
+
+ - The disclosed entities can be contacted to name experts who should
+ participate in the mitigation development.
+
+ - If an expert which is required to handle an issue is employed by an
+ listed entity or member of an listed entity, then the response teams can
+ request the disclosure of that expert from that entity. This ensures
+ that the expert is also part of the entity's response team.
Disclosure
""""""""""
@@ -158,10 +172,7 @@ Mitigation development
""""""""""""""""""""""
The initial response team sets up an encrypted mailing-list or repurposes
-an existing one if appropriate. The disclosing party should provide a list
-of contacts for all other parties who have already been, or should be,
-informed about the issue. The response team contacts these parties so they
-can name experts who should be subscribed to the mailing-list.
+an existing one if appropriate.
Using a mailing-list is close to the normal Linux development process and
has been successfully used in developing mitigations for various hardware
@@ -175,9 +186,24 @@ development branch against the mainline kernel and backport branches for
stable kernel versions as necessary.
The initial response team will identify further experts from the Linux
-kernel developer community as needed and inform the disclosing party about
-their participation. Bringing in experts can happen at any time of the
-development process and often needs to be handled in a timely manner.
+kernel developer community as needed. Bringing in experts can happen at any
+time of the development process and needs to be handled in a timely manner.
+
+If an expert is employed by or member of an entity on the disclosure list
+provided by the disclosing party, then participation will be requested from
+the relevant entity.
+
+If not, then the disclosing party will be informed about the experts
+participation. The experts are covered by the Memorandum of Understanding
+and the disclosing party is requested to acknowledge the participation. In
+case that the disclosing party has a compelling reason to object, then this
+objection has to be raised within five work days and resolved with the
+incident team immediately. If the disclosing party does not react within
+five work days this is taken as silent acknowledgement.
+
+After acknowledgement or resolution of an objection the expert is disclosed
+by the incident team and brought into the development process.
+
Coordinated release
"""""""""""""""""""
@@ -216,7 +242,7 @@ an involved disclosed party. The current ambassadors list:
ARM
AMD
IBM
- Intel
+ Intel Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Qualcomm Trilok Soni <tsoni@codeaurora.org>
Microsoft Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

Privacy Policy