aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/Documentation
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>2019-09-25 10:29:49 +0200
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2019-09-29 12:43:18 +0200
commitdc925a36060e8cef050a9d05c64dae1c30dc5027 (patch)
tree55f97dbc8e3f3b808c2f07ca0ee3f8b8aeb1a07f /Documentation
parent38c7a30a9d5ff8dd0c7a9ab1441aa5a96cf60afa (diff)
Documentation/process: Clarify disclosure rules
The role of the contact list provided by the disclosing party and how it affects the disclosure process and the ability to include experts into the development process is not really well explained. Neither is it entirely clear when the disclosing party will be informed about the fact that a developer who is not covered by an employer NDA needs to be brought in and disclosed. Explain the role of the contact list and the information policy along with an eventual conflict resolution better. Reported-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.21.1909251028390.10825@nanos.tec.linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/process/embargoed-hardware-issues.rst40
1 files changed, 33 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/process/embargoed-hardware-issues.rst b/Documentation/process/embargoed-hardware-issues.rst
index e57b9f39c69f..a3c3349046c4 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/embargoed-hardware-issues.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/embargoed-hardware-issues.rst
@@ -143,6 +143,20 @@ via their employer, they cannot enter individual non-disclosure agreements
in their role as Linux kernel developers. They will, however, agree to
adhere to this documented process and the Memorandum of Understanding.
+The disclosing party should provide a list of contacts for all other
+entities who have already been, or should be, informed about the issue.
+This serves several purposes:
+
+ - The list of disclosed entities allows communication accross the
+ industry, e.g. other OS vendors, HW vendors, etc.
+
+ - The disclosed entities can be contacted to name experts who should
+ participate in the mitigation development.
+
+ - If an expert which is required to handle an issue is employed by an
+ listed entity or member of an listed entity, then the response teams can
+ request the disclosure of that expert from that entity. This ensures
+ that the expert is also part of the entity's response team.
Disclosure
""""""""""
@@ -158,10 +172,7 @@ Mitigation development
""""""""""""""""""""""
The initial response team sets up an encrypted mailing-list or repurposes
-an existing one if appropriate. The disclosing party should provide a list
-of contacts for all other parties who have already been, or should be,
-informed about the issue. The response team contacts these parties so they
-can name experts who should be subscribed to the mailing-list.
+an existing one if appropriate.
Using a mailing-list is close to the normal Linux development process and
has been successfully used in developing mitigations for various hardware
@@ -175,9 +186,24 @@ development branch against the mainline kernel and backport branches for
stable kernel versions as necessary.
The initial response team will identify further experts from the Linux
-kernel developer community as needed and inform the disclosing party about
-their participation. Bringing in experts can happen at any time of the
-development process and often needs to be handled in a timely manner.
+kernel developer community as needed. Bringing in experts can happen at any
+time of the development process and needs to be handled in a timely manner.
+
+If an expert is employed by or member of an entity on the disclosure list
+provided by the disclosing party, then participation will be requested from
+the relevant entity.
+
+If not, then the disclosing party will be informed about the experts
+participation. The experts are covered by the Memorandum of Understanding
+and the disclosing party is requested to acknowledge the participation. In
+case that the disclosing party has a compelling reason to object, then this
+objection has to be raised within five work days and resolved with the
+incident team immediately. If the disclosing party does not react within
+five work days this is taken as silent acknowledgement.
+
+After acknowledgement or resolution of an objection the expert is disclosed
+by the incident team and brought into the development process.
+
Coordinated release
"""""""""""""""""""

Privacy Policy