aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/block
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMing Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>2018-01-18 00:41:51 +0800
committerJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>2018-01-17 09:46:26 -0700
commit7bed45954b95601230ebf387d3e4e20e4a3cc025 (patch)
tree546b673aef51257fc7479cf73d71abe4f511c865 /block
parent85cf955df8317bbc513663b5610979fdd6a0da2a (diff)
blk-mq: make sure hctx->next_cpu is set correctly
When hctx->next_cpu is set from possible online CPUs, there is one race in which hctx->next_cpu may be set as >= nr_cpu_ids, and finally break workqueue. The race can be triggered in the following two sitations: 1) when one CPU is becoming DEAD, blk_mq_hctx_notify_dead() is called to dispatch requests from the DEAD cpu context, but at that time, this DEAD CPU has been cleared from 'cpu_online_mask', so all CPUs in hctx->cpumask may become offline, and cause hctx->next_cpu set a bad value. 2) blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() is called from CPU B, and found the queue should be run on the other CPU A, then CPU A may become offline at the same time and all CPUs in hctx->cpumask become offline. This patch deals with this issue by re-selecting next CPU, and making sure it is set correctly. Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Cc: Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reported-by: "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com> Tested-by: "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com> Fixes: 20e4d81393 ("blk-mq: simplify queue mapping & schedule with each possisble CPU") Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Diffstat (limited to 'block')
-rw-r--r--block/blk-mq.c30
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index c8f62e6be6b6..3bd41f1066ee 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1319,21 +1319,47 @@ static void __blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
*/
static int blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
{
+ bool tried = false;
+
if (hctx->queue->nr_hw_queues == 1)
return WORK_CPU_UNBOUND;
if (--hctx->next_cpu_batch <= 0) {
int next_cpu;
-
+select_cpu:
next_cpu = cpumask_next_and(hctx->next_cpu, hctx->cpumask,
cpu_online_mask);
if (next_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
next_cpu = cpumask_first_and(hctx->cpumask,cpu_online_mask);
- hctx->next_cpu = next_cpu;
+ /*
+ * No online CPU is found, so have to make sure hctx->next_cpu
+ * is set correctly for not breaking workqueue.
+ */
+ if (next_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
+ hctx->next_cpu = cpumask_first(hctx->cpumask);
+ else
+ hctx->next_cpu = next_cpu;
hctx->next_cpu_batch = BLK_MQ_CPU_WORK_BATCH;
}
+ /*
+ * Do unbound schedule if we can't find a online CPU for this hctx,
+ * and it should only happen in the path of handling CPU DEAD.
+ */
+ if (!cpu_online(hctx->next_cpu)) {
+ if (!tried) {
+ tried = true;
+ goto select_cpu;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Make sure to re-select CPU next time once after CPUs
+ * in hctx->cpumask become online again.
+ */
+ hctx->next_cpu_batch = 1;
+ return WORK_CPU_UNBOUND;
+ }
return hctx->next_cpu;
}

Privacy Policy